<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Per-instance choices for Django&#8217;s forms.ChoiceField</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reliablybroken.com/b/2009/03/per-instance-choices-for-djangos-formschoicefield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reliablybroken.com/b/2009/03/per-instance-choices-for-djangos-formschoicefield/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s a blog: let&#039;s do funch!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:44:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reliably Broken &#187; Using an object for Django&#8217;s ChoiceField choices</title>
		<link>http://reliablybroken.com/b/2009/03/per-instance-choices-for-djangos-formschoicefield/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Reliably Broken &#187; Using an object for Django&#8217;s ChoiceField choices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reliablybroken.com/b/?p=65#comment-123</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] had another thought about per-instance choices for forms.ChoiceField. Instead of overriding the &lt;strong&gt;init&lt;/strong&gt; method of your form class, you could use an object with an [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had another thought about per-instance choices for forms.ChoiceField. Instead of overriding the <strong>init</strong> method of your form class, you could use an object with an [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reliably Broken &#187; The gap between Filemaker and Django</title>
		<link>http://reliablybroken.com/b/2009/03/per-instance-choices-for-djangos-formschoicefield/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Reliably Broken &#187; The gap between Filemaker and Django</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reliablybroken.com/b/?p=65#comment-42</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] learnt that the best approach is to avoid a ForeignKey and store the value as a regular field but use the choices field option with a dynamic list. A competing approach is to never delete objects from the related model but to have another field [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] learnt that the best approach is to avoid a ForeignKey and store the value as a regular field but use the choices field option with a dynamic list. A competing approach is to never delete objects from the related model but to have another field [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
